[PATCH v1] android: camera_device: Do not pass `nullptr` to `Request::addBuffer()`

Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Tue Jun 3 17:38:55 CEST 2025


Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2025-06-03 14:57:17)
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 03:45:35PM +0200, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> > The default argument already takes care of passing no fence to
> > `addBuffer()`, so there is no reason to specify `nullptr` explicitly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze <barnabas.pocze at ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> >  src/android/camera_device.cpp | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/android/camera_device.cpp b/src/android/camera_device.cpp
> > index a038131ae..5dfa1fe22 100644
> > --- a/src/android/camera_device.cpp
> > +++ b/src/android/camera_device.cpp
> > @@ -1078,8 +1078,7 @@ int CameraDevice::processCaptureRequest(camera3_capture_request_t *camera3Reques
> >               FrameBuffer *frameBuffer = cameraStream->getBuffer();
> >               buffer.internalBuffer = frameBuffer;
> >  
> > -             descriptor->request_->addBuffer(sourceStream->stream(),
> > -                                             frameBuffer, nullptr);
> > +             descriptor->request_->addBuffer(sourceStream->stream(), frameBuffer);
> 
> I'd keep the original line wrap.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>

Cleaner without the nullptr indeed.

Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>


> 
> >  
> >               requestedStreams.insert(sourceStream);
> >       }
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list